| SRES 13 IS
107th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 13
Expressing the sense
of the Senate regarding the need for Congress to enact a new farm bill
during the 1st session of the 107th Congress.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED
STATES
January 22, 2001
Mr. DASCHLE (for himself, Mr.
HARKIN, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. KOHL,
Mr. SARBANES, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. KERRY,
Mrs. CARNAHAN, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. SCHUMER, and
Mr. AKAKA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense
of the Senate regarding the need for Congress to enact a new farm bill
during the 1st session of the 107th Congress.
Whereas in contrast to the
economic prosperity enjoyed by Americans over the past several years, many
agriculture-dependent rural economies have continued to experience serious
economic hardship;
Whereas independently owned
and operated farms and ranches that are integral to the economic and social
stability of rural America, but that are relatively less able to withstand
economic shock, have suffered disproportionately during this period of
ongoing economic distress;
Whereas the contract payments
authorized by the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7201 et
seq.) increasingly are considered by producers to be inequitable because--
(1) the contract payments
are not based on current production, but are instead based on 85 percent
of program yields established in 1986 and frozen in 1990;
(2) the contract payments
are provided to owners and producers that may no longer be producing the
crop on which the contract payments are calculated;
(3) the contract payments
are not available to producers of nonprogram crops, including soybeans
and other oilseeds, resulting in further inequities and arbitrariness in
making emergency farm payments;
(4) the contract payments
are not available to owners and producers that did not enter into production
flexibility contracts under the Agricultural Market Transition Act; and
(5) the contract payments
are made for crops regardless of whether the crops are experiencing low
prices;
Whereas despite being promoted
as a means of limiting farm program spending, current farm policy necessitated
record levels of program spending and emergency assistance packages;
Whereas the previous record
of $26,000,000,000 in direct payments through the Commodity Credit Corporation
for fiscal year 1986 during the heart of the farm crisis in the 1980's
was eclipsed by direct payments made for fiscal year 2000 by nearly $6,300,000,000;
Whereas even at these high
levels of farm program and emergency spending, the farm economy and the
financial condition of farm and ranch families and rural communities continues
to decline;
Whereas agricultural producers
are extremely frustrated and dissatisfied with the inconsistent criteria
for receipt of disaster payments, the unpredictability of the payments,
and the inequity of the payments across producers, regions, and agricultural
commodities; and
Whereas over the past 3 years,
Congress has waited until well into the legislative year before considering
and responding to the need for disaster payments and then has justified
the use of unnecessarily simplistic and fiscally wasteful payment formulas
by claiming that there was inadequate time to devise superior alternatives:
Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That Congress
should--
(1) enact a new farm bill
during the 1st session of the 107th Congress;
(2) include in the budget
resolution for fiscal year 2002 sufficient funds to provide an adequate
farm income safety net and eliminate the need for off-budget, emergency
spending;
(3) ensure that all farm-related
payments are allocated fairly and reasonably and in relation to need; and
(4) provide such additional
sums as are necessary to fund other farm bill priorities, such as priorities
involving rural development and telecommunication, conservation, research,
nutrition, and food safety.
END
|