June 30, 2009
    Climate Change; Animal Agriculture; Sen. Chambliss Blocks Nomination; Sec. Vilsack; and Ag Prices
    Posted By Keith Good



Climate Change; Animal Agriculture; Sen. Chambliss Blocks Nomination; Sec. Vilsack; and Ag Prices

Climate Change

Bloomberg writers Lorraine Woellert and Simon Lomax reported yesterday that, “U.S. House Democrats cheered when they won a vote to impose the nation’s first limits on greenhouse-gas emissions. Senate Democrats didn’t join the party.

“‘They don’t have my vote yet,’ said Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio. ‘In the Senate this bill will not pass unless Midwestern Democratic senators support it in large numbers.’

“The hard-won 219-212 vote on June 26 to move a climate bill through the House was just a first step on a difficult legislative path. Several climate measures are being crafted in the Senate, where the regional and philosophical differences that dogged the House measure are even more sharply defined.”

The Bloomberg article added that, “Climate-change legislation is a top priority of President Barack Obama, who has asked Congress to pass a bill before December’s United Nations climate talks in Copenhagen. In his weekend radio address, Obama said the House plan would transform the nation’s economy and create millions of jobs. Today, Obama said he is confident the Senate will follow in the House’s footsteps.

“‘I am confident that they, too, will choose to move this country forward,’ Obama said in Washington, where he and Energy Secretary Steven Chu set new efficiency standards for lamps.” [A video replay of President Obama’s comments from yesterday is available here (9:28)].

The Bloomberg authors explained that, “Long before the House vote, work began on how to get a bill through the Senate. In March, Chu, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson and other Obama administration officials dined at the home of Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry of Massachusetts. The group pondered how to rally Senate support for a climate bill while preserving its mandate to focus on environmentally friendly alternative energy sources such as cellulosic biomass and nuclear power.

Even so, broad Senate support for cap-and-trade legislation has yet to materialize.”

Yesterday’s article indicated that, “Even with Obama’s backing, ‘it’s going to be very tough,’ Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee Chairman Tom Harkin of Iowa said in an interview.

“Harkin, Brown and their Midwestern and industrial-state colleagues are concerned that a cap-and-trade system would raise energy costs on consumers, including farmers, while forcing U.S. companies to comply with stricter environmental standards than their overseas competitors. Yet any effort to weaken environmental mandates risks losing support of senators such as Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent.”

And with respect to American leadership on the climate issue, James Kanter reported yesterday at the Green Inc. Blog (The New York Times) that, “Many environmental advocates have called the recent passage of a climate bill through the United States Congress a landmark achievement in the struggle to address climate change.

But to some Europeans, the United States still appears to be taking baby steps.

Andreas Carlgren, the Swedish minister for the environment, told journalists on Friday in Brussels that passage of the Waxman-Markey bill would be significant, but added that American emissions reduction targets still risked falling far short of what would be needed to reach a global deal at United Nations negotiations in December in Copenhagen.”

Animal Agriculture- Focus on Ohio

Recall that Bob Meyer reported late last week at Brownfield that, “The Humane Society of the United States has made no secret Ohio is one of the next states targeted for their effort to ban the use of calf crates, sow crates and battery cages.

The Ohio State Legislature has made a move to head HSUS off, passing a proposed constitutional amendment which would create a 13-member Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board. That board would develop best-practice standards for the confinement of animals. The State Director of Agriculture would chair the group made up of the State Veterinarian, a college agricultural dean, a county humane society member, two consumer representatives, a food safety expert and farmers. The rules and standards would be enforced by the Ohio Department of Agriculture.”

On yesterday’s AgriTalk radio program, host Mike Adams discussed this development in much greater detail with Jack Fisher, the Executive Vice President of the Ohio Farm Bureau.

To listen to this portion of yesterday’s AgriTalk program with Mike Adams, just click here (MP3-10:00).

The discussion provides background on important issues that are facing Ohio farmers and the implications these recent developments in the Buckeye state could have for agricultural producers across the country.

Meanwhile, Rod Smith reported late last week at FeedStuffs Online that, “Two states, Michigan and Ohio, are considering legislation to keep animal care and well-being in the hands of the two states rather than the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS).

“The legislation has bipartisan support.

In Michigan, the legislation would establish the Michigan Agriculture Commission and Michigan Agriculture Department the sole authority for regulation of livestock and poultry health and welfare; it would also establish science-based standards for animal care that producers must implement by 2020, establish an animal care advisory council to keep the standards updated and establish a third-party auditing system to make sure the standards are in place.”

Mr. Smith explained that, “The action responds to the HSUS-led ballot initiative in California last year that was adopted by California voters and specifies that livestock and poultry should be housed according to HSUS standards, rather than those supported by animal ethicists and scientists.

“HSUS chief executive officer and president Wayne Pacelle said the Ohio legislation ‘provokes us’ to take a similar initiative to the Ohio ballot next year.”

Senator Chambliss Blocks Nomination

Alexander Bolton reported on Sunday at The Hill Online that, “Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) has blocked President Obama’s candidate for regulation czar, Harvard law professor Cass Sunstein, because Sunstein has argued that animals should have the right to sue humans in court.

Obama has picked Sunstein, his adviser and longtime friend, to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, an office that has power to review and assess all draft regulations proposed within the administration.”

The article indicated that, “But Chambliss worries that Sunstein’s innovative legal views may someday lead to a farmer having to defend himself in court against a lawsuit filed on behalf of his chickens or pigs.

“Chambliss told The Hill that he has blocked Sunstein’s nomination because the law professor ‘has said that animals ought to have the right to sue folks.’”

Mr. Bolton went on to report that, “Indeed, in his 2004 book, Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions, Sunstein wrote: ‘I will suggest that animals should be permitted to bring suit, with human beings as their representatives, to prevent violations of current law.’

“More specifically, he wrote: ‘Laws designed to protect animals against cruelty and abuse should be amended or interpreted to give a private cause of action against those who violate them, so as to allow private people to supplement the efforts of public prosecutors.’

Chambliss said he is also concerned about Sunstein’s potential impact on ‘a number of other issues relative to agriculture.’”

Sunday’s Hill article added that, “Sunstein’s nomination cleared the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee with ease in May. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) cast the only vote against him.

But various farming and ranching interests, including the American Farm Bureau Federation, have raised concerns about Sunstein. Several have contacted Republican farm-state senators to raise concern over Sunstein’s academic writings.”

“Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), a member of the Agriculture Committee, met with Sunstein earlier this month and said that Sunstein had provided assurance that he would not promote onerous regulations for farmers,” the article noted.

With respect to committee consideration of Mr. Sunstein’s nomination in May, the issue of animal rights and hunting did come up. To listen to an exchange on these issues between Susan Collins (R-Maine), the Homeland Security and Gov. Affairs Committee Ranking Member, and Mr. Sunstien, just click here (FarmPolicy.com audio-MP3-about five minutes).

Secretary Vilsack

The perspective and views of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack on a variety of current issues impacting agriculture have been noted in recent news items over the past couple of days.

Sec. Vilsack- Food Security

Reuters writer Mark Weinraub reported yesterday that, “The United States will shift its emphasis in the fight against global hunger from giving emergency aid to helping countries produce more of their own food, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said on Monday.

“Under the new approach, the United States will focus on providing expertise and training to boost agricultural productivity abroad, Vilsack said in a speech to the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. [A complete audio replay of the Sec.’s speech is available here].

“‘It is a more comprehensive, holistic view of food security that focuses on the notion that we want to make food more available, we want to make it accessible and we want to make sure that it is properly used,’ Vilsack said.

“‘If we can help countries become more productive themselves then they will be in a better position to feed their own people,’ he said.”

Yesterday’s Reuters article added that, “Vilsack did not provide details about how the new approach would be funded. He said he and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton plan to meet 28 African agriculture ministers in coming months to discuss their new approach.

“President Barack Obama has said his administration will ask Congress to double funding for agricultural development aid to $1 billion by 2010.”

A summary of Sec. Vilsack’s comments from yesterday was also included in yesterday’s Commodity News For Tomorrow report, a complimentary daily commodity publication provided by CME Group in partnership with Dow Jones Newswires. The Commodity News report noted that, “Also during the breakfast speech, Vilsack discussed last year’s food crisis and soaring prices, dismissing the role of ethanol. The main causes were energy prices, weather patterns and changing diets, he said.

“‘If it was the need for and demand for biofuels, one wonders why the price of food hasn’t gone down recently,’ Vilsack said.

“After the speech, Vilsack again voiced support for an increase in the ethanol blend rate to 15%, up from 10%, which is currently being considered by the Environmental Protection Agency.

“‘I don’t know what the percentage will be, but I’m hopeful it will be raised,’ Vilsack said. ‘I think it will send an important message to the industry.’”

Sec. Vilsack- Climate Change

The Commodity News summary added that, “Vilsack also voiced support for the climate change bill that passed the U.S. House last week. He said the bill is just a first step but is better than doing nothing. It includes a cap-and-trade provision that would allow farmers to trade carbon offsets.

“‘When agriculture is 7%-10% of greenhouse emissions and can be 20%-25% of the solution, I like that in terms of opportunity,’ he said.”

Also on the climate bill, Andrew Duffelmeyer reported over the weekend at IowaPolitics.com that, “U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said Saturday evening that the U.S. House’s approval of a climate change bill this week might have been ‘one of the most important votes in the last 100 years.’

“‘It is a vote about the future,’ Vilsack said. ‘It is a vote about redefining the economy of this country. It is a vote about creating real jobs here in America that can support families and help create the middle class and support the middle class. It was a vote about a brighter, more compelling future for rural America and it was a vote that was a close vote.’”

Sec. Vilsack- Speculation Legislation- Biofuels

Reuters news reported yesterday that, “Congress is eyeing ways to make sure speculative trading helps commodity markets rather than distorting pricing signals, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said in a Reuters Television interview Monday.

“‘There are concerns,’ Vilsack said, noting he has spoken about the issue with Tom Harkin, chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee.

“‘I suspect that there will probably be an effort to make sure when there is trading that takes place on the market, that it’s trading that actually assists the market, doesn’t hurt the market, creates a robust trading scheme so that we get a good pricing signal,’ Vilsack said.”

Yesterday’s article added that, “Grain futures markets are bracing for more government regulation after a U.S. Senate probe blamed index funds for overinflating wheat prices last year.

“Vilsack toured the Chicago Board of Trade on Monday with executives from parent company CME Group Inc, the world’s largest derivatives exchange, which has said speculators were not responsible for price volatility.”

And on the biofuels issue, yesterday’s Reuters article explained that, “The expansion of biofuel production over the past few years also has been blamed for driving food prices higher. Most of the biofuel consumed in the United States is ethanol made from corn.

But the Obama administration remains supportive of the biofuels industry to wean Americans from foreign oil, Vilsack told Reuters.

“‘The President has been very, very clear about this. He wants the biofuel industry to take hold in this country. He wants us to break our addiction to foreign oil. The only way we can do that is by producing our own fuel and the biofuels industry is the way we are going to do that,’ Vilsack said.

“‘Corn-based ethanol will continue to be part of the solution but by no means the only way to produce ethanol.’”

Ag Prices

Yesterday, the USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) released its monthly Agricultural Prices report.

In part, the NASS report stated that, “The corn price, at $3.93 per bushel, is down 4 cents from last month and $1.54 below June 2008 [related graph]… The soybean price, at $11.60 per bushel, increased 90 cents from May but is $1.50 below June 2008 [related graph]… and…The June all wheat price, at $5.69 per bushel, is down 15 cents from May and $1.93 below June 2008 [related graph].

Keith Good

FarmPolicy.com is a FREE newsletter and is made possible by the generous support of McLeod, Watkinson & Miller- Attorneys at Law.

To subscribe to the FarmPolicy.com Email, send a note to, farmpolicy-on@list.farmpolicy.com.

 



News Archive



We believe that America's farmers and ranchers will support the most enlightened governmental policies when given timely, accurate and complete information. Therefore, it is our goal to make available to them at no cost the same information that is used by lawmakers and USDA officials.

Produced by AgricultureLaw.com, L.L.C., a company dedicated to providing farmers and ranchers with the most complete source of timely information and ideas on agricultural policy.

Michael R. McLeod, President
Randy Green, Editor
Richard Pasco, General Manager
Lydia Lorenz, Web Site Coordinator


NOTE: Materials posted on this Web Site do not consitute legal advice, nor does AgricultureLaw.com warrant the accuracy of the information on this site. Click here for full disclosure.

Copyright © AgricultureLaw.com, L.L.C.